AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Português

 Home ] LOVE STORE ] Table of Contents ] Meanings of Life ]


Home page
WHAT IS LOVE
Contradictions
Love of People
Love is Nothing
Love Cycles
Love and Time
Love and Art
Mockeries
ROMANTIC LOVE
Beauty and Love
Love is a Game
Big and Small Loves
Abelard Heloise
Love Literature
BROTHERLY LOVE
Brotherly Appeals
Command Love
Machiavelli Love
Lack of Love
With and Without Love
MEN AND WOMEN
Feminine Complaints
Love Games
Male Complaints
Genes and Males
Male Thought
Male Chauvinism
Marriage Irrational
Marriage Love Grave
LOVE SEX PLEASURE
Libertine Love
Love Sex Humour
LOVE FRIENDSHIP
Friendship Treasons
Friendship and Sex
Friends in Literature
LOVE EVIL
Nazis Love
Love Nourishes Evil
Genocide and Genes
Dreams of Love
LOVE IDEAS
Slaves of Ideas
LOVE & LACK TRUTH
To Lie is Legitime
Love Trivialities
Love Myths
LOVE & SCIENCE
Love and Genes
Beautiful Girls
Love and Robots
LOVE HITLER HISTORY
Paths of History
LOVE & POLITICS
Love humanity
Sex Politics
Patriotism
SOCIETY & ECONOMICS
Love and Market
Liberalism and Profit
LOVE & VALUES
Love and Gratitude
Love and Humility
Love and Pride
Love and Reason
Love and Tolerance
LOVE AND ETHICS
Love Animals
Pacifism and Militarism
Sites & Links


 

 


Should We Lie in the Name of Love? Truth Isn't Above Human Duties of Love and Wisdom
Kant Categorical Imperatives


Kant, the great German philosopher of the eighteenth century, was an indefectible defender of reason. Reason dignifies us, ennobles us, turns us into superior beings. Accordingly, our reason should conceive rules, such as «Do not lye in any occasion» which he called «categorical imperatives» and to which we should obey piously. 

Kant didn’t admit exceptions to these imperatives, settled by reason. Only then they were «categorical».To be faithful to truth, in particular, was a kind of non-breakable, scientific postulate, to which we should obey in all circumstances, even if it is a cause of avoidable suffering, even if it benefits those who do not deserve, or damages poor and weak people. To Kant, our human dignity depends on it.

But should we always face truth in Kant’s terms? Should we face the Kantian categorical imperatives abstractly, even if they cost us our life, or represent unhappiness, or extreme sacrifices and pain?

Should we – in the name of the categorical imperative of truth - denounce a member of our family to a murder? Should we reveal to the dying person his true condition? Is it illegitimate to lie to the criminals that pursue and torment innocent people?

The humanist answer must be no. The truth that causes unnecessary suffering to the moribund or to innocents is cruelty. Not to lie to murderers is cruelty and foolish collaborationism. The «categorical imperatives» can and should be broken.
 
There are, of course, many cases when truth should be defended, despite its costs in terms of pain and suffering. We can’t lie to ourselves, and deny reality, just to live comfortably in our dreams – as creationist ones, postulating that we aren’t descendants of apes and ultimately from bacteria. We can’t lie to ourselves and deny such scientific truths. But we also can’t put truth above all. Truth can’t be above our duties of love and wisdom.


Books, Films
, Cultural Stuff on these and other related issues? See Love Essays Store (in association with Amazon)
 

Quotations
Categorical Imperatives. Truth and Lies


The truth is often a terrible weapon of aggression. It is possible to lie, and even to murder, for the truth.

Alfred Adler, 1870-1937, Austrian psychiatrist, The problem of neurosis



Woe to those who place above love the criminal truth of informing! Woe to the brutes who always speak the truth! Woe to those who have never lied!

Someone who tells a dying person that he is going to die lies: first, literally, because he simply doesn’t know, because only God knows, because no man has the right to tell another man he is going to die.

 

Poor, lonely people should not be made to suffer; this is more important than anything else, including truth.

V. Jankélévitch, 1903-1985, French essayiste, Traité des vertus


It is better to lie than to torture, better to lie than to terrify. Truth cannot take the place of everything.

André Comte-Sponville, French philosopher, A short Treatise on the Great Virtues


Everything must not be said, for that would be folly; but what one says should be what one thinks, otherwise it is knavery.

Montaigne, 1533-1592, French philosopher, Essays

 

One cannot legitimately lie to oneself, for to do so is to value oneself more than the truth, to value one’s comfort or good conscience more than one’s mind.

André Comte-Sponville, French philosopher, A short Treatise on the Great Virtues

It is not truth that makes man great, but man who makes truth great.
Confucius, 551- 479 b. C., Chinese philosopher, Analects


It takes two to speak the truth: one to speak, and another to hear.
Henry D. Thoreau, 1817-1862, American writer, A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers


Books, Films, Cultural Stuff on these and other related issues? See Love Essays Store (in association with Amazon)
 

Love and Truth? See also:
  Men Love Trivialities, banalities, lies, common sense...
 
Press, news and lack of Love to truth, humility, tolerance...
  Humans love myths and dreams, not the true knowing


Return Top - We should lie in the name of Love. Truth isn't above love and wisdom.
Return Home - Love Essays Book and Quotations
 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Site and Essays' author: Eduardo Reisinho, Setúbal, Portugal. Copyright Eduardo Reisinho -