AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Português

 Home ] LOVE STORE ] Table of Contents ] Meanings of Life ]


Home page
WHAT IS LOVE
Contradictions
Love of People
Love is Nothing
Love Cycles
Love and Time
Love and Art
Mockeries
ROMANTIC LOVE
Beauty and Love
Love is a Game
Big and Small Loves
Abelard Heloise
Love Literature
BROTHERLY LOVE
Brotherly Appeals
Command Love
Machiavelli Love
Lack of Love
With and Without Love
MEN AND WOMEN
Feminine Complaints
Love Games
Male Complaints
Genes and Males
Male Thought
Male Chauvinism
Marriage Irrational
Marriage Love Grave
LOVE SEX PLEASURE
Libertine Love
Love Sex Humour
LOVE FRIENDSHIP
Friendship Treasons
Friendship and Sex
Friends in Literature
LOVE EVIL
Nazis Love
Love Nourishes Evil
Genocide and Genes
Dreams of Love
LOVE IDEAS
Slaves of Ideas
LOVE & LACK TRUTH
To Lie is Legitime
Love Trivialities
Love Myths
LOVE & SCIENCE
Love and Genes
Beautiful Girls
Love and Robots
LOVE HITLER HISTORY
Paths of History
LOVE & POLITICS
Love humanity
Sex Politics
Patriotism
SOCIETY & ECONOMICS
Love and Market
Liberalism and Profit
LOVE & VALUES
Love and Gratitude
Love and Humility
Love and Pride
Love and Reason
Love and Tolerance
LOVE AND ETHICS
Love Animals
Pacifism and Militarism
Sites & Links


 

 


Beautiful and Ugly Girls and Women

People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would be great.
James Watson, American Biologist, in NewScientist.com, 28/2/2003  

James Watson, one of the two co-discovers of DNA, was a man of strong convictions who did not fear being polemic. To him to change our genome and change ourselves through genetic engineering was entirely justifiable.

The important thing, to Watson, was human happiness. To change our genome to turn ugly into beautiful women was just a means of removing the suffering linked to ugliness.

To James Watson there wasn’t any sort of sanctity in the genetic code responsible for the construction of the human body and brain. This code was just a product of millions of years of small events moulded by chance and the blind logic of nature, involving tremendous suffering and the disappearance of millions of species in the framework of the struggle for survival and adaptation to the environment. Something Darwin has described in well known sharp terms: «What a book a Devil's Chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature».

Hence James Watson’s position: it’s totally legitimate to alter our genetic code, even if the case was turning ugly into beautiful women.

But this is not the perspective of conservative and namely religious circles. To them, the human genome is impregnated with sanctity. Our genome is the result of God’s superior intentions, and shouldn’t be altered. To open the door to such modifications is to alter human nature and a step to making us hybrid beings.

Both positions are pertinent. Our concordance or discordance depends on what we love most. If we love, as the conservatives, the idea of a mankind created in the image of God, a somehow superior nature, determined by mysterious and divine forces, then we would abominate James Watson’s ideas about pretty and ugly girls. Otherwise, if we love the idea of secular happiness, progress and science, and if we don’t place our nature at any special top level, we would agree with Watson. It’s those nuclear loves that turn the making of the pretty girls proposed by Watson into a good or horrible thing.


Books, Films, Cultural Stuff on these and other related issues? See Love Essays Store (in association with Amazon)
 

Love & Science? See also:
  Love and the interests of Genes
 
Love, Passions, Homicide, Infidelity... Are Driven by Genes
  Robots, Androids, Love and Human Future
 


Return Top - Beautiful and Ugly Girls / Women
Return Home - Love Essays Book and Quotations
 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Site and Essays' author: Eduardo Reisinho, Setúbal, Portugal. Copyright Eduardo Reisinho -